<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Fanagement - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-9e3c5788" type="application/json"/><link>http://fanagement.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://fanagement.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 23:56:48 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Relationships Are The New Distribution</title><link>http://www.fanagement.com/2010/10/relationships-are-the-new-distribution/#comment-93197401</link><description>Hey Hugh,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You're right - it's a much more complex discussion in itself... I think it's cool to be ubiquitous within a certain niche or scene, but where you do and don't maintain a presence contributes to your brand as an artist and helps create context that hooks potential fans and allows them to understand and relate to you better. So in general, I still think 'ubiquity is overrated'... &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Will definitely be digging deeper into this!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Greg Bates</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 23:56:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Relationships Are The New Distribution</title><link>http://www.fanagement.com/2010/10/relationships-are-the-new-distribution/#comment-93193834</link><description>Thanks!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Greg Bates</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 23:37:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Relationships Are The New Distribution</title><link>http://www.fanagement.com/2010/10/relationships-are-the-new-distribution/#comment-93193694</link><description>This is a great post Greg! I'll definitely retweet!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">digimusicbids.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 23:36:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Relationships Are The New Distribution</title><link>http://www.fanagement.com/2010/10/relationships-are-the-new-distribution/#comment-92827498</link><description>Spot on, Greg. Except for the Godin bit.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When an artist is relatively unknown, ubiquity helps with discovery. but once a few fan relationships have been developed, a little exclusivity can help cement the relationship. Those relationships then work to distribute virally because of the increased value ...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's far more complex and subtle than Godin's post has room for.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hugh Brown</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 17:20:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Importance of Context in Music Discovery</title><link>http://www.fanagement.com/2008/12/the-importance-of-context/#comment-80230326</link><description>I think this post was secretly a great kick off to a potential series of write ups about this topic. So many bloggers pretend to comprehend what they're talking about when it comes to this topic and really, nearly no one actually get it. You seem to grasp it however, so I think you ought to run with it. Thanks!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Basil Zarilla</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 04:05:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Importance of Context in Music Discovery</title><link>http://www.fanagement.com/2008/12/the-importance-of-context/#comment-67636437</link><description>Greg, enjoyed this opening post of your blog. Clear, concise, and sensible approach to getting a grip on this topic. I'm hoping that you'll be writing more on these three steps individually in posts to come, since each of them separately contains so much to dig into. All the best to you.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bill Cabrera</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 17:26:16 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
